In all cases that these functions are needed, the VMManager can just be
retrieved and used instead of providing the same functions in Process'
interface.
This also makes it a little nicer dependency-wise, since it gets rid of
cases where the VMManager interface was being used, and then switched
over to using the interface for a Process instance. Instead, it makes
all accesses uniform and uses the VMManager instance for all necessary
tasks.
All the basic memory mapping functions did was forward to the Process'
VMManager instance anyways.
Similar to the service capability flags, however, we currently don't
emulate the GIC, so this currently handles all interrupts as being valid
for the time being.
Handles the priority mask and core mask flags to allow building up the
masks to determine the usable thread priorities and cores for a kernel
process instance.
We've had the old kernel capability parser from Citra, however, this is
unused code and doesn't actually map to how the kernel on the Switch
does it. This introduces the basic functional skeleton for parsing
process capabilities.
If a thread handle is passed to svcGetProcessId, the kernel attempts to
access the process ID via the thread's instance's owning process.
Technically, this function should also be handling the kernel debug
objects as well, however we currently don't handle those kernel objects
yet, so I've left a note via a comment about it to remind myself when
implementing it in the future.
Starts the process ID counter off at 81, which is what the kernel itself
checks against internally when creating processes. It's actually
supposed to panic if the PID is less than 81 for a userland process.
Now it also indicates the name and max session count. This also gives a
name to the unknown bool. This indicates if the created port is supposed
to be using light handles or regular handles internally. This is passed
to the respective svcCreatePort parameter internally.
Adds the barebones enumeration constants and functions in place to
handle memory attributes, while also essentially leaving the attribute
itself non-functional.
Services created with the ServiceFramework base class install themselves as HleHandlers with an owning shared_ptr in the ServerPort ServiceFrameworkBase::port member variable, creating a cyclic ownership between ServiceFrameworkBase and the ServerPort, preventing deletion of the service objects.
Fix that by removing the ServiceFrameworkBase::port member because that was only used to detect multiple attempts at installing a port. Instead store a flag if the port was already installed to achieve the same functionality.
In the previous change, the memory writing was moved into the service
function itself, however it still had a problem, in that the entire
MemoryInfo structure wasn't being written out, only the first 32 bytes
of it were being written out. We still need to write out the trailing
two reference count members and zero out the padding bits.
Not doing this can result in wrong behavior in userland code in the following
scenario:
MemoryInfo info; // Put on the stack, not quaranteed to be zeroed out.
svcQueryMemory(&info, ...);
if (info.device_refcount == ...) // Whoops, uninitialized read.
This can also cause the wrong thing to happen if the user code uses
std::memcmp to compare the struct, with another one (questionable, but
allowed), as the padding bits are not guaranteed to be a deterministic
value. Note that the kernel itself also fully zeroes out the structure
before writing it out including the padding bits.
Moves the memory writes directly into QueryProcessMemory instead of
letting the wrapper function do it. It would be inaccurate to allow the
handler to do it because there's cases where memory shouldn't even be
written to. For example, if the given process handle is invalid.
HOWEVER, if the memory writing is within the wrapper, then we have no
control over if these memory writes occur, meaning in an error case, 68
bytes of memory randomly get trashed with zeroes, 64 of those being
written to wherever the memory info address points to, and the remaining
4 being written wherever the page info address points to.
One solution in this case would be to just conditionally check within
the handler itself, but this is kind of smelly, given the handler
shouldn't be performing conditional behavior itself, it's a behavior of
the managed function. In other words, if you remove the handler from the
equation entirely, does the function still retain its proper behavior?
In this case, no.
Now, we don't potentially trash memory from this function if an invalid
query is performed.
This would result in svcSetMemoryAttribute getting the wrong value for
its third parameter. This is currently fine, given the service function
is stubbed, however this will be unstubbed in a future change, so this
needs to change.
The kernel returns a memory info instance with the base address set to
the end of the address space, and the size of said block as
0 - address_space_end, it doesn't set both of said members to zero.
Gets the two structures out of an unrelated header and places them with
the rest of the memory management code.
This also corrects the structures. PageInfo appears to only contain a
32-bit flags member, and the extra padding word in MemoryInfo isn't
necessary.
Amends the MemoryState enum to use the same values like the actual
kernel does. Also provides the necessary operators to operate on them.
This will be necessary in the future for implementing
svcSetMemoryAttribute, as memory block state is checked before applying
the attribute.
The Process object kept itself alive indefinitely because its handle_table
contains a SharedMemory object which owns a reference to the same Process object,
creating a circular ownership scenario.
Break that up by storing only a non-owning pointer in the SharedMemory object.
Based off RE, the backing code only ever seems to use 0-2 as the range
of values 1 being a generic log enable, with 2 indicating logging should
go to the SD card. These are used as a set of flags internally.
Given we only care about receiving the log in general, we can just
always signify that we want logging in general.
Zach Hilman