This commit: Implements CPU Interrupts, Replaces Cycle Timing for Host
Timing, Reworks the Kernel's Scheduler, Introduce Idle State and
Suspended State, Recreates the bootmanager, Initializes Multicore
system.
Now that literally every other API function is converted over to the
Memory class, we can just move the file-local page table into the Memory
implementation class, finally getting rid of global state within the
memory code.
The Write functions are used slightly less than the Read functions,
which make these a bit nicer to move over.
The only adjustments we really need to make here are to Dynarmic's
exclusive monitor instance. We need to keep a reference to the currently
active memory instance to perform exclusive read/write operations.
With all of the trivial parts of the memory interface moved over, we can
get right into moving over the bits that are used.
Note that this does require the use of GetInstance from the global
system instance to be used within hle_ipc.cpp and the gdbstub. This is
fine for the time being, as they both already rely on the global system
instance in other functions. These will be removed in a change directed
at both of these respectively.
For now, it's sufficient, as it still accomplishes the goal of
de-globalizing the memory code.
A fairly straightforward migration. These member functions can just be
mostly moved verbatim with minor changes. We already have the necessary
plumbing in places that they're used.
IsKernelVirtualAddress() can remain a non-member function, since it
doesn't rely on class state in any form.
Migrates all of the direct mapping facilities over to the new memory
class. In the process, this also obsoletes the need for memory_setup.h,
so we can remove it entirely from the project.
Currently, the main memory management code is one of the remaining
places where we have global state. The next series of changes will aim
to rectify this.
This change simply introduces the main skeleton of the class that will
contain all the necessary state.
Our initialization process is a little wonky than one would expect when
it comes to code flow. We initialize the CPU last, as opposed to
hardware, where the CPU obviously needs to be first, otherwise nothing
else would work, and we have code that adds checks to get around this.
For example, in the page table setting code, we check to see if the
system is turned on before we even notify the CPU instances of a page
table switch. This results in dead code (at the moment), because the
only time a page table switch will occur is when the system is *not*
running, preventing the emulated CPU instances from being notified of a
page table switch in a convenient manner (technically the code path
could be taken, but we don't emulate the process creation svc handlers
yet).
This moves the threads creation into its own member function of the core
manager and restores a little order (and predictability) to our
initialization process.
Previously, in the multi-threaded cases, we'd kick off several threads
before even the main kernel process was created and ready to execute (gross!).
Now the initialization process is like so:
Initialization:
1. Timers
2. CPU
3. Kernel
4. Filesystem stuff (kind of gross, but can be amended trivially)
5. Applet stuff (ditto in terms of being kind of gross)
6. Main process (will be moved into the loading step in a following
change)
7. Telemetry (this should be initialized last in the future).
8. Services (4 and 5 should ideally be alongside this).
9. GDB (gross. Uses namespace scope state. Needs to be refactored into a
class or booted altogether).
10. Renderer
11. GPU (will also have its threads created in a separate step in a
following change).
Which... isn't *ideal* per-se, however getting rid of the wonky
intertwining of CPU state initialization out of this mix gets rid of
most of the footguns when it comes to our initialization process.
In 93da8e0abf, the page table construct
was moved to the common library (which utilized these inclusions). Since
the move, nothing requires these headers to be included within the
memory header.
The locations of these can actually vary depending on the address space
layout, so we shouldn't be using these when determining where to map
memory or be using them as offsets for calculations. This keeps all the
memory ranges flexible and malleable based off of the virtual memory
manager instance state.
Liam