This situation may happen like so:
Thread 1 with low priority calls WaitProcessWideKey with timeout.
Thread 2 with high priority calls WaitProcessWideKey without timeout.
Thread 3 calls SignalProcessWideKey
- Thread 2 acquires the lock and awakens.
- Thread 1 can't acquire the lock and is put to sleep with the lock owner being Thread 2.
Thread 1's timeout expires, with the lock owner still being set to Thread 2.
This makes the formatting expectations more obvious (e.g. any zero padding specified
is padding that's entirely dedicated to the value being printed, not any pretty-printing
that also gets tacked on).
* GetSharedFontInOrderOfPriority
* Update pl_u.cpp
* Ability to use ReadBuffer and WriteBuffer with different buffer indexes, fixed up GetSharedFontInOrderOfPriority
* switched to NGLOG
* Update pl_u.cpp
* Update pl_u.cpp
* language_code is actually language code and not index
* u32->u64
* final cleanups
Verified with a hwtest and implemented based on reverse engineering.
Thread A's priority will get bumped to the highest priority among all the threads that are waiting for a mutex that A holds.
Once A releases the mutex and ownership is transferred to B, A's priority will return to normal and B's priority will be bumped.
Switch mutexes are no longer kernel objects, they are managed in userland and only use the kernel to handle the contention case.
Mutex addresses store a special flag value (0x40000000) to notify the guest code that there are still some threads waiting for the mutex to be released. This flag is updated when a thread calls ArbitrateUnlock.
TODO:
* Fix svcWaitProcessWideKey
* Fix svcSignalProcessWideKey
* Remove the Mutex class.
* Updated ACC with more service names
* Updated SVC with more service names
* Updated set with more service names
* Updated sockets with more service names
* Updated SPL with more service names
* Updated time with more service names
* Updated vi with more service names
Michael Scire